All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Wild Small Mammals and Ticks in Zoos-Reservoir of Agents with Zoonotic Potential?

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62157124%3A16170%2F21%3A43879670" target="_blank" >RIV/62157124:16170/21:43879670 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/62157124:16270/21:43879670 RIV/00216224:14510/21:00122465

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/10/6/777/pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/10/6/777/pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10060777" target="_blank" >10.3390/pathogens10060777</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Wild Small Mammals and Ticks in Zoos-Reservoir of Agents with Zoonotic Potential?

  • Original language description

    Wild small mammals and ticks play an important role in maintaining and spreading zoonoses in nature, as well as in captive animals. The aim of this study was to monitor selected agents with zoonotic potential in their reservoirs and vectors in a zoo, and to draw attention to the risk of possible contact with these pathogens. In total, 117 wild small mammals (rodents) and 166 ticks were collected in the area of Brno Zoo. Antibodies to the bacteria Coxiella burnetii, Francisella tularensis, and Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. were detected by a modified enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 19% (19/99), 4% (4/99), and 15% (15/99) of rodents, respectively. Antibodies to Leptospira spp. bacteria were detected by the microscopic agglutination test in 6% (4/63) of rodents. Coinfection (antibodies to more than two agents) were proved in 14.5% (15/97) of animals. The prevalence of C. burnetii statistically differed according to the years of trapping (p = 0.0241). The DNAs of B. burgdorferi s.l., Rickettsia sp., and Anaplasma phagocytophilum were detected by PCR in 16%, 6%, and 1% of ticks, respectively, without coinfection and without effect of life stage and sex of ticks on positivity. Sequencing showed homology with R. helvetica and A. phagocytophilum in four and one positive samples, respectively. The results of our study show that wild small mammals and ticks in a zoo could serve as reservoirs and vectors of infectious agents with zoonotic potential and thus present a risk of infection to zoo animals and also to keepers and visitors to a zoo.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    40301 - Veterinary science

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Pathogens

  • ISSN

    2076-0817

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    10

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    6

  • Country of publishing house

    CH - SWITZERLAND

  • Number of pages

    11

  • Pages from-to

  • UT code for WoS article

    000666242200001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85108995070