All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

The influence of gender-diverse boards on post-audit practices: A UK SME study

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18450%2F22%3A50018559" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18450/22:50018559 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0013791X.2021.2000685?journalCode=utee20" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0013791X.2021.2000685?journalCode=utee20</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2021.2000685" target="_blank" >10.1080/0013791X.2021.2000685</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    The influence of gender-diverse boards on post-audit practices: A UK SME study

  • Original language description

    This article extends the project-engineering management/post-audit literature into the field of business ethics and board gender diversity. As a result, it fills an important gap in the literature. Board gender diversity is an important issue with ramifications on corporate decision-making. Based on a sample of 163 UK small-medium enterprises (SMEs), our research shows differences between gender diverse (GD) boards and male-only boards in post-audit (P-A) practices. GD boards conduct more post-audits and adopt a more formal approach to post-audit procedures. There are significant differences between the two board types concerning the reasons for undertaking post-audits and the non-adoption of post-audits (P-As). An interesting observation is in the area of risk aversion, as we find an inconsistency between those SMEs that conduct P-As and those that do not. This inconsistency may reflect the earlier literature, which is inconclusive in its findings concerning females&apos; attitudes to risk. A further interesting observation from the data analysis shows that GD Boards appear to be more focused, while male boards are more diverse in their responses. This article is of relevance and general interest to engineering economists in an investment appraisal, P-A, project management, and governance environment, fostering diversity and equality in regulating corporate activities, assisting practitioners and policy-makers in understanding the importance of monitoring capital projects, and the role played by gender-diverse boards.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50204 - Business and management

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Engineering economist

  • ISSN

    0013-791X

  • e-ISSN

    1547-2701

  • Volume of the periodical

    67

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    19

  • Pages from-to

    112-130

  • UT code for WoS article

    000715681700001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85118614699