Critical Factors and Economic Methods for Regulatory Impact Assessment in the Medical Device Industry
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18450%2F22%3A50019019" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18450/22:50019019 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.dovepress.com/critical-factors-and-economic-methods-for-regulatory-impact-assessment-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-RMHP" target="_blank" >https://www.dovepress.com/critical-factors-and-economic-methods-for-regulatory-impact-assessment-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-RMHP</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S346928" target="_blank" >10.2147/RMHP.S346928</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Critical Factors and Economic Methods for Regulatory Impact Assessment in the Medical Device Industry
Original language description
Introduction: The regulatory area is one that restricts human behaviour and opportunities, but it also allows the prevention of loss of property, health, or even life in various fields. Regulations provide the market with public confidence, which is extremely important in the field of innovative medical devices. The aim of this article is to analyse critical factors and economic methods for regulatory impact assessment in the medical device industry, to focus on the finances, processes, or innovation activity of organisations operating in the medical device sector. Methods: The paper consists of a scoping review according to the PRISMA methodology of the available literature in Web of Science and Scopus database, whereby combing the keywords “regulation” AND “innovation” AND “medical device” AND “economic impact,” we obtained a set of 156 results in the form of English-written articles. The output was then limited to the period between 2011 and 2020. Finally, 23 papers were used based on the exclusion and inclusion criteria. Results: The resulting challenges of the identified problems in particular are the amount of high-quality data available at an appropriate cost and the availability of a flexible notified body. There are also challenges specific to the situation, such as demands on the safety of medical devices for children. From a public expectations point of view, there is a continuing need to maintain the urgency of the balance between available innovation and safety. Discussion: As for the methods of economic assessment in general, or methods for assessing the economic impact of regulations in particular, cost-effectiveness analysis is the most commonly used method for research and development, while internal rate of return is frequently used for the producers, and budget impact analysis is typically used for healthcare service providers. A non-financial indicator that is often discussed is the time demands associated with meeting compliance requirements. The time-to-market indicator is also often mentioned. Economic and financial topics are not discussed in depth, as the reviewed articles simply mention the generally high costs attendant on complying with regulations and obtaining certificates. © 2022 Maci and Marešová.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30312 - Substance abuse
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2022
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
ISSN
1179-1594
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
15
Issue of the periodical within the volume
January
Country of publishing house
NZ - NEW ZEALAND
Number of pages
21
Pages from-to
71-91
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85123934002