All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Deep Disagreement and Naturalized Ethics

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18460%2F22%3A50020071" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18460/22:50020071 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://www.filozofia.sav.sk/sk/view/details/regular/2022/10/4422" target="_blank" >http://www.filozofia.sav.sk/sk/view/details/regular/2022/10/4422</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2022.77.10.2" target="_blank" >10.31577/filozofia.2022.77.10.2</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Deep Disagreement and Naturalized Ethics

  • Original language description

    Disagreement over moral issues is not uncommon and usually is not considered an obstacle in the search for the right solutions. Differences among individuals’ moral beliefs can be explained by the application of different non-moral facts, i.e., by different epistemology. Some ethicists believe that such a problem is not for ethics to solve. This paper aims to show that this conviction is mistaken, as moral and epistemological aspects present two sides of the same coin. Although on the moral level, one might be optimistic and hope for finding an agreement with peers based on relevant argumentation, on the epistemological level, such optimism is impossible. The main reason is deep disagreement, which occurs sooner or later when solving controversial moral dilemmas. The paper tries to explain how certain types of deep disagreement might be normatively solved within the framework of naturalized ethics.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60302 - Ethics (except ethics related to specific subfields)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Filozofia

  • ISSN

    0046-385X

  • e-ISSN

    2585-7061

  • Volume of the periodical

    77

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    10

  • Country of publishing house

    SK - SLOVAKIA

  • Number of pages

    14

  • Pages from-to

    756-769

  • UT code for WoS article

    000905334500003

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85149020928