All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

The (il)legality of the Iraq War of 2003: An Analytical Reveiw of the Causes and Justifications for the US-led invasion

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18460%2F23%3A50020180" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18460/23:50020180 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311886.2022.2163066" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311886.2022.2163066</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2163066" target="_blank" >10.1080/23311886.2023.2163066</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    The (il)legality of the Iraq War of 2003: An Analytical Reveiw of the Causes and Justifications for the US-led invasion

  • Original language description

    This study aims to establish whether the 2003 Iraq war was waged within the confines of United Nations (UN) Charter rules. To achieve this, the study analyses the circumstances under which armed force in international relations (IR) may be used within the provisions of the UN Charter. In the wake of the contentious US-led war in Iraq, critics opine that the UN thresholds for waging war were not met by the US and its allies. The US argued that the war was justified given the unprecedented security challenges occasioned mainly by 9/11. Crucially, post 9/11 US re-ordering of international security fed on the narrative that preventative strikes against states that it suspected to be potential havens for terrorist activities (the so-called rogue states) was within the broader UN Charter parameters of self-defence. Using the UN Security Council Resolutions (SCRs) on Iraq, and the UN Charter (1945) rules on warfare as a framework of analysis, this study navigates the causal factors and justifications for and against the Iraq war. The study concludes that although the US faced security challenges and arguably had fathomable reasons, the invasion of Iraq was conducted without UN authorisation, and hence in defiance of the UN Charter rules.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50601 - Political science

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Cogent Social Sciences

  • ISSN

    2331-1886

  • e-ISSN

    2331-1886

  • Volume of the periodical

    9

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    27

  • Pages from-to

    "Article number: 2163066"

  • UT code for WoS article

    000910107100001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85148456084