A definite must read Argumentation in literary reviews

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18460%2F24%3A50022117" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18460/24:50022117 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://benjamins.com/catalog/jaic.24005.gar" target="_blank" >https://benjamins.com/catalog/jaic.24005.gar</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jaic.24005.gar" target="_blank" >10.1075/jaic.24005.gar</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
A definite must read Argumentation in literary reviews
Original language description
The present study aims at clarifying how in literary reviews value judgements about novels are justified. For this purpose we first give an overall description of the place of literary reviews in journalism. Then, we characterize literary reviews as an argumentative activity type. Next, we turn to the argumentative pattern prototypical of literary reviews. To illustrate our account of literary reviews, we present an exemplary analysis of a particular review. In so doing we propose a tool for the empirical study of literary reviews.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year
2024
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)