Endoscopic management of ampullary tumors: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F65269705%3A_____%2F21%3A00074444" target="_blank" >RIV/65269705:_____/21:00074444 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216224:14110/21:00121429
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/a-1397-3198" target="_blank" >https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/a-1397-3198</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1397-3198" target="_blank" >10.1055/a-1397-3198</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Endoscopic management of ampullary tumors: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline
Original language description
Main Recommendations 1 ESGE recommends against diagnostic/therapeutic papillectomy when adenoma is not proven. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 2 ESGE recommends endoscopic ultrasound and abdominal magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for staging of ampullary tumors. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 3 ESGE recommends endoscopic papillectomy in patients with ampullary adenoma without intraductal extension, because of good results regarding outcome (technical and clinical success, morbidity, and recurrence). Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 4 ESGE recommends en bloc resection of ampullary adenomas up to 20-30mm in diameter to achieve R0 resection, for optimizing the complete resection rate, providing optimal histopathology, and reduction of the recurrence rate after endoscopic papillectomy. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 5 ESGE suggests considering surgical treatment of ampullary adenomas when endoscopic resection is not feasible for technical reasons (e.g. diverticulum, size >4cm), and in the case of intraductal involvement (of >20mm). Surveillance thereafter is still mandatory. Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 6 ESGE recommends direct snare resection without submucosal injection for endoscopic papillectomy. Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 7 ESGE recommends prophylactic pancreatic duct stenting to reduce the risk of pancreatitis after endoscopic papillectomy. Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 8 ESGE recommends long-term monitoring of patients after endoscopic papillectomy or surgical ampullectomy, based on duodenoscopy with biopsies of the scar and of any abnormal area, within the first 3 months, at 6 and 12 months, and thereafter yearly for at least 5 years. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30219 - Gastroenterology and hepatology
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2021
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Endoscopy
ISSN
0013-726X
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
53
Issue of the periodical within the volume
04
Country of publishing house
DE - GERMANY
Number of pages
20
Pages from-to
429-448
UT code for WoS article
000629334400001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85102904039