All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Endoscopic management of ampullary tumors: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F65269705%3A_____%2F21%3A00074444" target="_blank" >RIV/65269705:_____/21:00074444 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/00216224:14110/21:00121429

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/a-1397-3198" target="_blank" >https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/a-1397-3198</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1397-3198" target="_blank" >10.1055/a-1397-3198</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Endoscopic management of ampullary tumors: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline

  • Original language description

    Main Recommendations 1 ESGE recommends against diagnostic/therapeutic papillectomy when adenoma is not proven. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 2 ESGE recommends endoscopic ultrasound and abdominal magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for staging of ampullary tumors. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 3 ESGE recommends endoscopic papillectomy in patients with ampullary adenoma without intraductal extension, because of good results regarding outcome (technical and clinical success, morbidity, and recurrence). Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 4 ESGE recommends en bloc resection of ampullary adenomas up to 20-30mm in diameter to achieve R0 resection, for optimizing the complete resection rate, providing optimal histopathology, and reduction of the recurrence rate after endoscopic papillectomy. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 5 ESGE suggests considering surgical treatment of ampullary adenomas when endoscopic resection is not feasible for technical reasons (e.g. diverticulum, size &gt;4cm), and in the case of intraductal involvement (of &gt;20mm). Surveillance thereafter is still mandatory. Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 6 ESGE recommends direct snare resection without submucosal injection for endoscopic papillectomy. Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 7 ESGE recommends prophylactic pancreatic duct stenting to reduce the risk of pancreatitis after endoscopic papillectomy. Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 8 ESGE recommends long-term monitoring of patients after endoscopic papillectomy or surgical ampullectomy, based on duodenoscopy with biopsies of the scar and of any abnormal area, within the first 3 months, at 6 and 12 months, and thereafter yearly for at least 5 years. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30219 - Gastroenterology and hepatology

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Endoscopy

  • ISSN

    0013-726X

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    53

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    04

  • Country of publishing house

    DE - GERMANY

  • Number of pages

    20

  • Pages from-to

    429-448

  • UT code for WoS article

    000629334400001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85102904039