Screening and differential diagnosis of delirium in neurointensive stroke patients
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F65269705%3A_____%2F24%3A00079745" target="_blank" >RIV/65269705:_____/24:00079745 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216224:14110/24:00135609
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024019492?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024019492?via%3Dihub</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25918" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25918</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Screening and differential diagnosis of delirium in neurointensive stroke patients
Original language description
Diagnosing delirium in neurointensive care is difficult because symptoms of delirium, such as inappropriate speech, may be related to aphasia due to primary brain injury. Therefore, validated screening tools are needed. The aim of this study was to compare two Czech versions of already validated screening tools the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) and the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) - in a cohort of acute stroke patients. We also aimed to assess the pitfalls of delirium detection in the context of non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). We analysed 138 stroke patients admitted to the neurological intensive care unit (ICU) or stroke unit. According to expert judgement, which was used as the gold standard, 38 patients (27.54%) developed delirium. The sensitivity and specificity of the ICDSC were 91.60% and 95.33%, respectively, and the positive and negative predictive values were 76.76% and 98.54%, respectively. Similarly, the sensitivity and specificity of CAM-ICU were 75.63% and 96.74%, respectively, and the positive and negative predictive values were 79.65% and 95.93%, respectively. We did not detect an episode of NCSE mimicking delirium in any of our stroke patients who were judged to be delirious by expert assessment. Our results suggest that the ICDSC may be a more suitable tool for delirium screening than the CAM-ICU in patients with neurological deficit. NCSE as a mimic of delirium seems to be less common in the acute phase of stroke than previously reported.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10700 - Other natural sciences
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/EF19_073%2F0016943" target="_blank" >EF19_073/0016943: Internal grant agency of Masaryk University</a><br>
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2024
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Heliyon
ISSN
2405-8440
e-ISSN
2405-8440
Volume of the periodical
10
Issue of the periodical within the volume
4
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
9
Pages from-to
"e25918"
UT code for WoS article
001184517300001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85187301304