Reproductive outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for cervical cancer - results of the multicenter FERTISS study
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F65269705%3A_____%2F24%3A00080343" target="_blank" >RIV/65269705:_____/24:00080343 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216224:14110/24:00137169 RIV/00216208:11110/24:10485247 RIV/61989592:15110/24:73625764 RIV/00098892:_____/24:10158758 RIV/00064165:_____/24:10485247
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825824010916?pes=vor" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825824010916?pes=vor</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.08.020" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.08.020</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Reproductive outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for cervical cancer - results of the multicenter FERTISS study
Original language description
Introduction: Fertility-sparing treatment (FST) for patients with cervical cancer intends to achieve oncologic outcomes comparable to those after radical treatment while maximizing reproductive outcomes, including the ability to conceive and minimizing the risk of prematurity. Methodology: International multicentre retrospective FERTISS study focused on patients treated with FST analysed timing of FST relative to pregnancy, conception attempts and methods, abortion rates, prophylactic procedures reducing the risk of severe prematurity, pregnancy duration, and delivery mode. Results: Of the 733 patients treated at 44 centres in 13 countries, 49.7% attempted to conceive during median follow-up of 72 months and 22.6% (166/733) patients achieved a successful pregnancy. Success rate was significantly higher after non-radical surgery (63.2%; 122/193) compared to radical trachelectomy (25.7%; 44/171, p < 0.001). Available perinatological data shows that 89.5% (111/124) of the patients became pregnant naturally. There was no significant difference in the abortion rate in the first pregnancy nor delivery success rates between non-radical and radical procedures patients. Preterm delivery (<38 weeks gestation) occurred more frequently after radical than non-radical procedures (76.5% vs. 57.7%, p = 0.15). Almost all patients (97.3%; 73/75) who underwent regular ultrasound cervicometry in pregnancy with subsequent prophylactic procedures delivered a live fetus, compared to 30.6% (15/49) women without such management, p < 0.001. Conclusion: Patients who underwent non-radical surgery had significantly higher pregnancy rates. Most pregnancies resulted in a viable fetus, but radical trachelectomy led to a higher rate of preterm births in the severe prematurity range. Half of the patients did not attempt pregnancy after FST. (C) 2024 Elsevier Inc.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30214 - Obstetrics and gynaecology
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2024
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Gynecologic Oncology
ISSN
0090-8258
e-ISSN
1095-6859
Volume of the periodical
190
Issue of the periodical within the volume
NOV 2024
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
7
Pages from-to
179-185
UT code for WoS article
001312918200001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85202148692