Do nectar manipulative studies support cross-pollination hypothesis?
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67179843%3A_____%2F07%3A00317544" target="_blank" >RIV/67179843:_____/07:00317544 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Do nectar manipulative studies support cross-pollination hypothesis?
Original language description
One explanation for the widespread absence of floral nectar in many orchids is that it causes pollinators to visit fewer flowers on non-rewarding plants, resulting in more outcrossed progeny and more efficient pollen export. In the last two decades, thecross-pollination hypothesis has been tested by several experiments, in which nectar was added or removed from the flowers of non-rewarding and rewarding orchids, respectively. On the basis of the literature survey, I will summarize the effects of nectarmanipulation on male and female reproductive success of orchids, with emphasis on the incidence of self-pollination. The consequences of these results for the theory and future research will be presente
Czech name
Podporují experimentální studie s nektarem hypotézu o cizosprášení?
Czech description
Příspěvek se týká syntézy výsledků plynoucích z experimentů manipulujících s přítomností nektaru u vstavačovitých
Classification
Type
O - Miscellaneous
CEP classification
EH - Ecology - communities
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/KJB600870601" target="_blank" >KJB600870601: Speciation processes in orchids</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)
Others
Publication year
2007
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů