Natura 2000-Solution for Eastern Europe or just a good start? The Sumava National Park as a test case

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67179843%3A_____%2F15%3A00454152" target="_blank" >RIV/67179843:_____/15:00454152 - isvavai.cz</a>

Alternative codes found

RIV/00216208:11310/15:10313678

Result on the web

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.03.028" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.03.028</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.03.028" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.biocon.2015.03.028</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Natura 2000-Solution for Eastern Europe or just a good start? The Sumava National Park as a test case

Original language description

Natura 2000 is a unique EU-wide network of protected areas, which aims to maintain European biodiversity or at least prevent its worsening based on Bird Directive 79/409/EEC and Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC. It is assumed that this will assure the long-term survival of Europe’s most valuable species and habitats. The new member states implemented the Natura 2000 Directives in their own legislation as a part of the EU-integration process. Here we present the practical difficulties of implementing these directives in the Czech Republic. Our results are mainly based on a case study of the Šumava NP. We analyze, why Natura 2000 may not work here and look for possible solutions, which would require changes in Natura 2000 policies and their implementation in national policies. We show five examples of activities, which were performed or are still planned despite the fact that Natura 2000 evaluations have clearly shown that they have or would have had significant negative effects on Natura 2000 habitats and species. These include canoeing in pearl mussels core zones, logging of spruce stands, park zonation, and ski lift and tourist trails in capercaillie core zones. We deduce that the unstable political conditions together with the weak position of the state representatives in the Czech Republic result in a situation in which the last remnants of justice together with newly implemented EU directives easily disappear. We then show that the problems encountered in implementing Natura 2000 directives in the Czech Republic are likely to affect their successful implementation in most other postcommunist countries. EU is supporting these countries financially, but this support should be much more conditional on full implementation of EU laws. Environmental subsidies should be conditional on fulfilment of the country’s obligations to EU nature protection. Proper use of EU money should be directly controlled by central EU authorities, not left entirely to the member states.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_x - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

CEP classification

DO - Protection of landscape

OECD FORD branch

—

Project

Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.

Continuities

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year

2015

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

Biological Conservation

ISSN

0006-3207

e-ISSN

—

Volume of the periodical

186

Issue of the periodical within the volume

jun

Country of publishing house

NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

Number of pages

8

Pages from-to

268-275

UT code for WoS article

000355061300031

EID of the result in the Scopus database

2-s2.0-84927138462