The FuGas 2.3 Framework for Atmosphere-Ocean Coupling: Comparing Algorithms for the Estimation of Solubilities and Gas Fluxes

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985807%3A_____%2F18%3A00492154" target="_blank" >RIV/67985807:_____/18:00492154 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos9080310" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos9080310</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos9080310" target="_blank" >10.3390/atmos9080310</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

The FuGas 2.3 Framework for Atmosphere-Ocean Coupling: Comparing Algorithms for the Estimation of Solubilities and Gas Fluxes

Original language description

Accurate estimates of the atmosphere–ocean fluxes of greenhouse gases and dimethyl sulphide (DMS) have great importance in climate change models. A significant part of these fluxes occur at the coastal ocean which, although much smaller than the open ocean, have more heterogeneous conditions. Hence, Earth System Modelling (ESM) requires representing the oceans at finer resolutions which, in turn, requires better descriptions of the chemical, physical and biological processes. The standard formulations for the solubilities and gas transfer velocities across air–water surfaces are 36 and 24 years old, and new alternatives have emerged. We have developed a framework combining the related geophysical processes and choosing from alternative formulations with different degrees of complexity. The framework was tested with fine resolution data from the European coastal ocean. Although the benchmark and alternative solubility formulations generally agreed well, their minor divergences yielded differences of up to 5.8% for CH4 dissolved at the ocean surface. The transfer velocities differ strongly (often more than 100%), a consequence of the benchmark empirical wind-based formulation disregarding significant factors that were included in the alternatives. We conclude that ESM requires more comprehensive simulations of atmosphere–ocean interactions, and that further calibration and validation is needed for the formulations to be able to reproduce it. We propose this framework as a basis to update with formulations for processes specific to the air–water boundary, such as the presence of surfactants, rain, the hydration reaction or biological activity.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_imp - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

10509 - Meteorology and atmospheric sciences

Project

—

Continuities

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year

2018

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

Atmosphere

ISSN

2073-4433

e-ISSN

—

Volume of the periodical

9

Issue of the periodical within the volume

8

Country of publishing house

CH - SWITZERLAND

Number of pages

18

Pages from-to

—

UT code for WoS article

000443247300024

EID of the result in the Scopus database

2-s2.0-85054931276