Letter to the editor of Heliyon re: Grassmann, G. „New considerations on the validity of the Wiener-Granger causality test” [Heliyon 6 (2020) e05208]

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985807%3A_____%2F21%3A00548093" target="_blank" >RIV/67985807:_____/21:00548093 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07948" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07948</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07948" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07948</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Letter to the editor of Heliyon re: Grassmann, G. „New considerations on the validity of the Wiener-Granger causality test” [Heliyon 6 (2020) e05208]
Original language description
Dear Editor, a recently published article questions the Wiener-Granger causality test, more commonly referred to as the Granger causality test. Although the abstract of the paper states that the results were obtained by mathematical tools such as the Fourier transform and differential calculus, the presented serious claim that „...not even the most basic requirement underlying any possible definition of causality is met by the Granger causality test...” is in fact based on a questionable numerical testing of two filtered neural signals (A and B). We will show that the validity of the presented considerations is unfounded for several reasons.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10102 - Applied mathematics

Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year
2021
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)