All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Does a zero inter-rater reliability mean grant peer review is arbitrary?

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985807%3A_____%2F21%3A00570045" target="_blank" >RIV/67985807:_____/21:00570045 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://www.shinyitemanalysis.org/docs/Metascience-2021-IRR.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.shinyitemanalysis.org/docs/Metascience-2021-IRR.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Does a zero inter-rater reliability mean grant peer review is arbitrary?

  • Original language description

    ZÁKLADNÍ ÚDAJE: Does a zero inter-rater reliability mean grant peer review is arbitrary? [Metascience 2021. Virtual, 16.09.2021-25.09.2021]. ABSTRAKT: Are grant funding outcomes arbitrary? Those who argue “yes” often cite low inter-rater reliability (IRR) in grant peer review to support their claims. Inspired by a recent study that reported an IRR of zero in the mock peer review of top-quality grant proposals, we use real data from a complete range of submissions to the National Institutes of Health and to the American Institute of Biological Sciences to demonstrate that (1) estimating local IRR from subsets of restricted-quality proposals will likely result in zero estimates under many scenarios and (2) zero estimates of IRR are possible even when the true value is not zero. Zero estimates from range-restricted data should not be interpreted as indicating arbitrariness in peer review because, despite different scoring scales used by the two agencies, when complete ranges of proposals are considered, IRR estimates are above 0.6 which indicates good reviewer agreement.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    O - Miscellaneous

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10103 - Statistics and probability

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA21-03658S" target="_blank" >GA21-03658S: Theoretical foundations of computational psychometrics</a><br>

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů