All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Robust Bayesian Meta-Analysis: Model-Averaging Across Complementary Publication Bias Adjustment Methods

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985807%3A_____%2F23%3A00559478" target="_blank" >RIV/67985807:_____/23:00559478 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1594" target="_blank" >https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1594</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1594" target="_blank" >10.1002/jrsm.1594</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Robust Bayesian Meta-Analysis: Model-Averaging Across Complementary Publication Bias Adjustment Methods

  • Original language description

    Publication bias is a ubiquitous threat to the validity of meta-analysis and the accumulation of scientific evidence. In order to estimate and counteract the impact of publication bias, multiple methods have been developed. However, recent simulation studies have shown the methods' performance to depend on the true data generating process, and no method consistently outperforms the others across a wide range of conditions. Unfortunately, when different methods lead to contradicting conclusions, researchers can choose those methods that lead to a desired outcome. To avoid the condition-dependent, all-or-none choice between competing methods and conflicting results, we extend robust Bayesian meta-analysis and model-average across two prominent approaches of adjusting for publication bias: (1) selection models of p-values and (2) models adjusting for small-study effects. The resulting model ensemble weights the estimates and the evidence for the absence/presence of the effect from the competing approaches with the support they receive from the data. Applications, simulations, and comparisons to preregistered, multi-lab replications demonstrate the benefits of Bayesian model-averaging of complementary publication bias adjustment methods.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10103 - Statistics and probability

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Research Synthesis Methods

  • ISSN

    1759-2879

  • e-ISSN

    1759-2887

  • Volume of the periodical

    14

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    18

  • Pages from-to

    99-116

  • UT code for WoS article

    000837024800001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85135529330