All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Similarities and differences in the ilia of Late Cretaceous anurans and urodeles

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985831%3A_____%2F12%3A00388162" target="_blank" >RIV/67985831:_____/12:00388162 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/00216208:11310/12:10209852

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.183.6.529" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.183.6.529</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.183.6.529" target="_blank" >10.2113/gssgfbull.183.6.529</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Similarities and differences in the ilia of Late Cretaceous anurans and urodeles

  • Original language description

    Screen-washing of matrix from 37 Upper Cretaceous microvertebrate localities in southern Utah, USA, yielded a rich sample of anuran disarticulated bones, including nearly 200 ilia. Because the bones are relatively small and delicate and were subject to pre-mortem transport and unavoidable damage when the fossiliferous matrix was collected and processed, none of the recovered ilia retained intact shafts. This means that features such as the form of the anterior end of the shaft and the presence and formof a dorsal crest cannot be used to identify the fossils. Urodele bones also are known from many of the same localities. When anuran and urodele ilia are isolated and missing much of their shafts, they are superficially similar, so it was important to reliably differentiate ilia of the two groups. Here we provide a list and brief descriptions of some of the features that we found useful for distinguishing between anuran and urodele ilia. These features relate to differences between the t

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    DB - Geology and mineralogy

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/ME08066" target="_blank" >ME08066: Evolution of the anuran assemblages during the Cretaceous in western part of North America; comparisons with the anuran fossil record in Eurasia</a><br>

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2012

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Bulletin de la Societe Geologique de France

  • ISSN

    0037-9409

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    183

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    6

  • Country of publishing house

    FR - FRANCE

  • Number of pages

    7

  • Pages from-to

    529-535

  • UT code for WoS article

    000316156200006

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database