Size-Resolved Penetration of Filtering Materials from CE-Marked Filtering Facepiece Respirators.
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985858%3A_____%2F17%3A00476259" target="_blank" >RIV/67985858:_____/17:00476259 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2016.09.0390" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2016.09.0390</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2016.09.0390" target="_blank" >10.4209/aaqr.2016.09.0390</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Size-Resolved Penetration of Filtering Materials from CE-Marked Filtering Facepiece Respirators.
Original language description
Throughout the years, the performance of the FFRs has been the topic of extensive studies, resulting mainly in the characterization of aerosol penetration through filters using aerosols that are thought to be similar to those encountered in workplaces. There are limited number of studies in the literature reporting CE-marked respirator performance, and there is a need to perform a penetration evaluation of CE-marked respirators through all 3 filtering classes: FFP1 (80%), FFP2 (94%), and FFP3 (99%). In this study, the percentage penetrations and the most penetrating particle size (MPPS) of 47 mm filters cut out from 13 different CE-marked respirator half masks (2 samples of each FFR) were evaluated size-selectively using nine sizes of charge-neutralized monodisperse aerosol, which ranged from 20 to 400 nm (CMD). Comparison of the penetrations at MPPS from all the examined filters showed that the percentage penetration ranged 3.2-16.3% (FFP1), 2.4-34.3% (FFP2), and 0.02-3.3% (FFP3). Experimental data also revealed that the penetration difference between 2 samples from the same respirator was in most cases up to 6.8%, and between 2 identical respirators up to 2.5%. The MPPS was found to be between 30 and 60 nm (CMD) in all measurements. By comparing the obtained results to the European Standard we conclude that the standard method underestimates particle penetration (especially for particles < 100 nm) due to the usage of non-neutralized, polydisperse test aerosol, detection methods burdened with measurement artifacts, and the assumption that the MPPS is at approximate to 600 nm (MMD) as the criterion for filtering facepieces to pass the penetration test.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2017
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Aerosol and Air Quality Research
ISSN
1680-8584
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
17
Issue of the periodical within the volume
5
Country of publishing house
TW - TAIWAN (PROVINCE OF CHINA)
Number of pages
11
Pages from-to
1305-1315
UT code for WoS article
000403503700017
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85018430348