A comparison of two endoscopic closures: over-the-scope clip (OTSC) versus KING closure (endoloop plus clips) in a randomized long-term experimental study
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985904%3A_____%2F16%3A00469025" target="_blank" >RIV/67985904:_____/16:00469025 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11130/16:10331854 RIV/00023001:_____/16:00060101
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4831-z" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4831-z</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4831-z" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00464-016-4831-z</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
A comparison of two endoscopic closures: over-the-scope clip (OTSC) versus KING closure (endoloop plus clips) in a randomized long-term experimental study
Original language description
Both over-the-scope clip (OTSC) and KING (endoloop + clips) closures provide reliable and safe full-thickness endoscopic closure. Nevertheless, OTSC clip demonstrated significantly inferior histological healing in the short-term follow-up. nTo compare OTSC versus KING closure of a perforation with regard to long-term effectiveness and macroscopic and histological quality of healing. nWe performed a randomized experimental study with 16 mini-pigs (mean weight 43.2 +/- 11.2 kg). A standardized perforation was performed on the anterior sigmoid wall. KING closure (n = 8) was attained by approximation of an endoloop fixed to the margins of a perforation with endoclips. OTSC closure (n = 8) was performed by deploying OTSC (OVESCO) over the defect. Pigs underwent a control sigmoidoscopy 8 months after the closure to assess the macroscopic quality of healing. Then, autopsy was performed and the rectosigmoid was sent for histopathological assessment. nAll closures were completed successfully without air leaks. The duration of closure was similar in both techniques (OTSC 17.8 +/- 7.6 min vs. KING 19.6 +/- 8.8 min). At autopsy, all KING closures (100 %) were healed with a flat scar without signs of leakage. Microscopically, no inflammatory changes were observed after KING closure. In the OTSC group, microscopic ulcers were present in two pigs (25 %), cryptal abscesses in three pigs (38 %) and significant neutrophil accumulation in all eight pigs (P < 0.01). Giant cell granulomas, dysplasia or abundant scarification was not observed in either group.nBoth OTSC and KING closures offer a long-term reliable seal of a gastrointestinal perforation without stenosis or fistulas. KING closure provides long-term histologically superior healing.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
FJ - Surgery including transplantology
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
ISSN
0930-2794
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
30
Issue of the periodical within the volume
11
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
7
Pages from-to
4910-4916
UT code for WoS article
000387225600028
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-84960102261