All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Digestate and Fugate - Fertilizers with Ecotoxicological Risks

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985939%3A_____%2F17%3A00480146" target="_blank" >RIV/67985939:_____/17:00480146 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/62157124:16270/17:43876084

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun201765041183" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun201765041183</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun201765041183" target="_blank" >10.11118/actaun201765041183</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Digestate and Fugate - Fertilizers with Ecotoxicological Risks

  • Original language description

    Only limited ecotoxicological information is known about the effects of digestate or fugate on terrestrial fauna and flora. This is the first study comparing the survival and reproduction of collembolans as the representative soil fauna and the root growth and photosynthetic activity of Sinapis alba and Panicum miliaceum plants when exposed to digestate and fugate. Comparison of ecotoxicological results with chemical analysis of both digestate and fugate has led to the conclusions that application of digestate and fugate was beneficial neither for tested plants, nor for zooedaphon. Under practically used dosing both digestate and fugate can represent potential ecotoxicological problems, which can affect zooedaphon diversity and reproduction resulting in degradation of soil structure, reduction of microbial activity or water retention capacity of treated soils. That is why we do recommend at least simplified ecotoxicological testing of digestate as presented in this study. Ecotoxicity testing can support decision of direct application on soil, or mixing the digestate with other materials (like compost, manure, pond sediments, or biochar), what will help to utilize nutrients and consequently can prevent degradation of soil fertility.Comparison of ecotoxicological results with chemical analysis of both digestate and fugate originating from a biogas plant has led to the conclusions that application of digestate and fugate as fertilizers into solution or soil was beneficial neither for tested plants, nor for zooedaphon. Under practically used dosing both digestate and fugate can represent potential ecotoxicological problems, which can affect zooedaphon diversity and reproduction resulting in degradation of soil structure, reduction of microbial activity or water retention capacity of treated soils.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/QJ1320234" target="_blank" >QJ1320234: From waste to commodities</a><br>

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2017

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis

  • ISSN

    1211-8516

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    65

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    4

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    6

  • Pages from-to

    1183-1188

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85028812534