Inclusion in body and mind: ensuring full participation of Indigenous peoples and local communities in decisions related to nature
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985939%3A_____%2F25%3A00638201" target="_blank" >RIV/67985939:_____/25:00638201 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-16300-300313" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-16300-300313</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-16300-300313" target="_blank" >10.5751/ES-16300-300313</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Inclusion in body and mind: ensuring full participation of Indigenous peoples and local communities in decisions related to nature
Original language description
The inclusion of the knowledge and perspectives of Indigenous peoples and local communities (IPLC) in global science-policy processes are increasingly being mandated. This is indicative of the recognition of their expertise and worldviews to inform social and ecological decisions. The IPBES Values Assessment (VA) explicitly highlighted the necessity for a nuanced engagement of different actors while undertaking valuation for decisions related to nature. In this paper we further reflect on the findings of Chapter 6 of the VA that focused on operationalizing diverse values approaches in policy. We examine how IPLC are consulted and their values included in sectoral and cross-sectoral policies interlinked with biodiversity. We specifically share IPLC experiences of the IPBES process based on personal reflections of a participating Indigenous scholar. Apart from emphasizing the pitfalls of excluding diverse IPLC values of nature from decision making, our review also discusses how IPLC perspectives are represented within global forums, and particularly in IPBES processes . Our analysis reveals that meaningful IPLC inclusion pertains to representation of knowledge (mind) and of active participation and agency to bring their networks into the discourse (body). While highlighting some major deficiencies of the current decision-making practices (e.g., lack of pluralistic and inclusive processes, human and financial resources, or culturally sensitive processes) that preclude the full and effective inclusion of IPLC, we offer promising approaches, specifically engaging reflexivity and learning, that can address these deficiencies and move toward ensuring higher representation of IPLC by and for themselves.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10619 - Biodiversity conservation
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Ecology and Society
ISSN
1708-3087
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
30
Issue of the periodical within the volume
3
Country of publishing house
CA - CANADA
Number of pages
14
Pages from-to
13
UT code for WoS article
001544436600004
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-105013181470