The Bricot?Mair Dispute. Scholastic Prolegomena to Non-Compositional Semantics

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F14%3A00428246" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/14:00428246 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2013.856101" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2013.856101</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2013.856101" target="_blank" >10.1080/01445340.2013.856101</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
The Bricot?Mair Dispute. Scholastic Prolegomena to Non-Compositional Semantics
Original language description
From a general semantic point of view, Thomas Bricot (d. 1516) and John Mair (1467-1550) are proponents of the solution to semantic paradoxes based on appreciation of the contextuality of truth, who differ in their approach to the relations of logical consequence and contradiction. The core of the study is the analysis of Mair's criticism of Bricot presented in the sixth quaestio of his Tractatus insolubilium where the consequences of non-compositional semantics for the concepts of synonymy and logicalform are addressed. The polemic between John Mair and Thomas Bricot is construed as having immediate consequences for research in the area of non-compositional semantics.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
AA - Philosophy and religion
OECD FORD branch
—

Project
<a href="/en/project/GP13-08389P" target="_blank" >GP13-08389P: Semantic paradoxes between first and second scholasticism</a><br>
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year
2014
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)