All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

On the Track of C/overt Research: Lessons From Taking Ethnographic Ethics to the Extreme

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F18%3A00478833" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/18:00478833 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/68378025:_____/18:00478833

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077800417732090" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077800417732090</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077800417732090" target="_blank" >10.1177/1077800417732090</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    On the Track of C/overt Research: Lessons From Taking Ethnographic Ethics to the Extreme

  • Original language description

    Despite the growing body of literature that critically assesses the ambiguous impacts of institutional review boards (IRBs) on anthropological research, the key standards on which the IRB evaluations are based often remain unquestioned. By exposing the genealogy of an undercover research in which the authors participated as ethnographer, supervisor, and research participant, this article problematizes some of these standards and addresses the issues of power dynamics in research, informed consent, and anonymization in published work. It argues that rather than addressing genuine ethical dilemmas, IRB standards and the ethical fiction of informed consent mainly protect researchers from having to openly facenthe uncertainties of fieldwork. As an alternative, the authors put forth the notion of c/overt research, which perceives any research as processual and, in effect, becoming overt only during the research process itself. As such, it forces researchers to cultivate sensitivity to research ethics.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50401 - Sociology

Result continuities

  • Project

    Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2018

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Qualitative Inquiry

  • ISSN

    1077-8004

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    24

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    7

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    11

  • Pages from-to

    453-463

  • UT code for WoS article

    000441608500003

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85051572812