Beyond Logical Pluralism and Logical Monism

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F20%3A00524920" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/20:00524920 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-020-00253-2" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-020-00253-2</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11787-020-00253-2" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11787-020-00253-2</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Beyond Logical Pluralism and Logical Monism
Original language description
Logical pluralism as a thesis that more than one logic is correct seems very plausible for two basic reasons. First, there are so many logical systems on the market today. And it is unclear how we should decide which of them gets the logical rules right. On the other hand, logical monism as the opposite thesis still seems plausible, as well, because of normativity of logic. An approach which would manage to bring a synthesis of both logical pluralism and logical monism is called for. I review the possible forms of logical pluralism and render them more plausible. I thus arrive at logical dynamism, a synthesis of various pluralisms and monism focused on how logic develops.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Project
<a href="/en/project/GA17-15645S" target="_blank" >GA17-15645S: Logical models of reasoning and argumentation in natural language</a><br>
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year
2020
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)