All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

The Argumenta sophistica in the Debate between Jerome of Prague and Blasius Lupus

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F21%3A00544918" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/21:00544918 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1484/M.SA-EB.5.122639" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1484/M.SA-EB.5.122639</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1484/M.SA-EB.5.122639" target="_blank" >10.1484/M.SA-EB.5.122639</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    The Argumenta sophistica in the Debate between Jerome of Prague and Blasius Lupus

  • Original language description

    This study focuses on the genre of sophisms with particular attention to their importance at the Faculty of Arts of the University of Prague and in the debate between Jerome of Prague and Blasius Lupus in 1409. While the first part deals with the context of the debate between the two scholars, the second suggests a new interpretation of the arrangement of the disputation and of the relevant texts. The third part offers a novel doctrinal interpretation of the three sophistical arguments included in the debate, basing on a new reading of the text extant in MS Praha, Knihovna Metropolitní Kapituly, N 12. The primary context of the solution to sophisms is the solution of an ontological question (“Utrum universalia sint ponenda”), rather than a purely logical analysis. The conclusion of those sophistical arguments is the non existence of universals and ideas, not acceptable from Jerome’s point of view. This part of the study reconstructs the basic logical and ontological principles of Jerome’s solution to Blasius’s sophisms. A new critical edition of the relevant segment of the debate is appended to the study.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    C - Chapter in a specialist book

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA19-16793S" target="_blank" >GA19-16793S: Philosophy at the University of Prague around 1409: Matěj of Kníns Quodlibet as a Crossroads of European Medieval Knowledge</a><br>

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Book/collection name

    Studying the Arts in Late Medieval Bohemia: Production, Reception and Transmission of Knowledge

  • ISBN

    978-2-503-59317-3

  • Number of pages of the result

    29

  • Pages from-to

    205-233

  • Number of pages of the book

    358

  • Publisher name

    Brepols

  • Place of publication

    Turnhout

  • UT code for WoS chapter