The “Offence of any and all Ready-Made Givenness”: Natorp’s Critique of Husserl’s Ideas I

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F21%3A00545804" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/21:00545804 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62159-9_4" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62159-9_4</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62159-9_4" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-030-62159-9_4</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

The “Offence of any and all Ready-Made Givenness”: Natorp’s Critique of Husserl’s Ideas I

Original language description

I present the first systematic account in the literature of a Husserlian response to Natorp’s critique of Husserl’s account (in Ideas I) of the pre-givenness of both the absolute stream of lived-experience and its essences to reflection. My response is presented within the broader context of what I argue is Heidegger’s misappropriation of Natorp’s critique of the phenomenological limits of reflection in Husserl’s transcendental phenomenology and the misguided French attempt to address Heidegger’s critique by introducing the dialectical notion of “pre-reflective” consciousness to phenomenology. My Husserlian response (1) shows that Husserl’s account of reflection in Ideas I is able to rebut Natorp’s critical claims that transcendental phenomenology cannot access the streaming of the stream of lived-experience without “stilling” its flow and (2) that a gap in Husserl’s account of the transformation of the natural phenomenon of reflection into transcendental reflection provides justification for Natorp’s criticism of the ambiguity of Husserl’s account in Ideas I of the givenness of the essence of lived-experience investigated by transcendental phenomenology.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

C - Chapter in a specialist book

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Project

—

Continuities

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year

2021

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Book/collection name

The Idealism-Realism Debate Among Edmund Husserl’s Early Followers and Critics

ISBN

978-3-030-62158-2

Number of pages of the result

25

Pages from-to

73-97

Number of pages of the book

311

Publisher name

Springer

Place of publication

Cham

UT code for WoS chapter

—