All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Five views of definienda in Alexander’s Quaestiones 1.3 and 2.14

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F21%3A00547704" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/21:00547704 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2021-0018" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2021-0018</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/elen-2021-0018" target="_blank" >10.1515/elen-2021-0018</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Five views of definienda in Alexander’s Quaestiones 1.3 and 2.14

  • Original language description

    In Quaestiones 1.3 and 2.14, Alexander presents a distinctly realist or essentialist view of the objects of definition, distinguished, on the one hand, from two types of realism rejected by Aristotle (definienda as separate forms and as particulars), and, on the other, from two types of conceptualism (non-essentialist and essentialist abstractivism) that probably belong within the Peripatetic tradition. The difference between Alexander’s view and essentialist abstractivism lies in his understanding of definienda not as the common concepts of things existing in the particulars, but as the common things conceived of as existing in the particulars. This paper offers a close reading of Quaest. 1.3, whose aim is to flesh out Alexander’s position vis-à-vis the objects of definition against the backdrop of the four rejected alternatives. The distinction between Alexander’s essentialism and the essentialist abstractivist notion of definienda is further explained in light of Quaest. 2.14. The amended Greek text of Quaest. 1.3 is appended with an English translation.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA20-16937S" target="_blank" >GA20-16937S: Aristotelian demonstration in the theory and practice of Galen's medical science</a><br>

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Elenchos

  • ISSN

    0392-7342

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    42

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2

  • Country of publishing house

    IT - ITALY

  • Number of pages

    24

  • Pages from-to

    351-374

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85122695756