All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

The Varieties of Praxis. Marx, Lukács, Feenberg, and Czechoslovak Marxism

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F22%3A00563320" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/22:00563320 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07877-4_11" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07877-4_11</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07877-4_11" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-031-07877-4_11</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    The Varieties of Praxis. Marx, Lukács, Feenberg, and Czechoslovak Marxism

  • Original language description

    The chapter addresses the question as to whether East-Central European Marxism was a distinctive intellectual phenomenon by focusing on the case of Czechoslovak Marxism. It gives an affirmative answer, as it claims that philosophy of praxis makes up its conceptual core. In a first step, Czechoslovak Marxism is situated in a broader plane of East-Central European Marxism and contrasted with Western Marxism. Then, two important intellectual sources of Czechoslovak Marxism are discussed: Marx’s early project of practical Materialism and Lukács’s theory of revolutionary spontaneity. In a third step the claim is substantiated that until the appearance of Marxist humanism in the late 1950s, one cannot sensu stricto speak of any comprehensive philosophy of praxis within Marxism. Thereafter, it is argued that it was specifically Czechoslovak Marxist humanism that came up with a comprehensive philosophy of praxis, including a theory of subjectivity. After that, Marxist philosophy of praxis is confronted with existential phenomenology. In a final step, a critical eye is casted on Andrew Feenberg’s efforts to accomplish a synthesis of the Marxist philosophy of praxis and Heidegger’s philosophy.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    C - Chapter in a specialist book

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Book/collection name

    The Necessity of Critique. Andrew Feenberg and the Philosophy of Technology

  • ISBN

    978-3-031-07876-7

  • Number of pages of the result

    21

  • Pages from-to

    199-219

  • Number of pages of the book

    280

  • Publisher name

    Springer

  • Place of publication

    Cham

  • UT code for WoS chapter