Catalina González Quintero. Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant. A Ciceronian Critique of Metaphysics [Review]
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F23%3A00577680" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/23:00577680 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1353/hms.2023.a910752" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1353/hms.2023.a910752</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Catalina González Quintero. Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant. A Ciceronian Critique of Metaphysics [Review]
Original language description
Quintero wants to take the discussions of Academic skepticism beyond the field of empirical science and concentrate on the attitude of the skeptics towards metaphysics, her aim is to show how Cicero, Hume, and Kant used skeptical means to examine the justification of metaphysical claims and to determine, in this way, which resulting beliefs could be held non-dogmatically. Quintero encourages the reader to investigate how modified versions of ancient skeptical doctrines have continued to play a role in other historical periods and philosophical contexts, recognizing that the history of philosophy and contemporary philosophical debates are interconnected and form a living entity.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
O - Miscellaneous
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2023
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů