All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Aristotle’s Notion of Deduction

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F23%3A00587823" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/23:00587823 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2023-0004" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2023-0004</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/disp-2023-0004" target="_blank" >10.2478/disp-2023-0004</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Aristotle’s Notion of Deduction

  • Original language description

    Aristotle’s notion of deduction (syllogism) differs from the conception of logical consequence in classical logic in two essential features, which are required by Aristotle’s definition of syllogism and are incorporated into his formalisation of deduction: in addition to the standard necessary truth-preservation, Aristotle requires relevance of premises for the conclusion and non-repetition of premises in the conclusion. These requirements, together with Aristotle’s conception of simple propositions, lead to the result that valid deductive steps (syllogisms) must have very specific forms, namely the well-known syllogistic shape. All other kinds of deduction lacking this shape, such as “syllogisms based on a hypothesis”, can be considered “syllogisms” only in a relative sense: they are based on an assumption of the existence of genuine syllogistic deductions in the syllogistic shape. Aristotle’s demands should cover all kinds of deduction: all valid deduction must be relevant and non-repetitive. This brings Aristotle’s definition much closer to the intuition associated with the notion of logical consequence.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA23-07119S" target="_blank" >GA23-07119S: MEANING AS AN OBJECT – PRINCIPLES OF SEMANTIC THEORIES</a><br>

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Disputatio. International Journal of Philosophy

  • ISSN

    0873-626X

  • e-ISSN

    2182-2875

  • Volume of the periodical

    15

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    68

  • Country of publishing house

    PT - PORTUGAL

  • Number of pages

    25

  • Pages from-to

    90-114

  • UT code for WoS article

    001263242800005

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-105000470249