At the Crossroads. Patočka and Althusser on the Idea of Modern Science
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F25%3A00601889" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/25:00601889 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-024-09680-z" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-024-09680-z</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11212-024-09680-z" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11212-024-09680-z</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
At the Crossroads. Patočka and Althusser on the Idea of Modern Science
Original language description
In this article, I examine the points of confluence and dissonance in Jan Patočka and Louis Althusser’s respective theories of the idea of modern science, focusing on two texts from 1965, Patočka’s “Conférences de Louvain” and Althusser’s Lire le Capital. I argue that while Patočka’s diagnosis—which he shares with Husserl-of the “abyss” lying between the empty schematism of modern scientific formalization and an engaged concern for the přirození svět or “natural world” (broadly analogous to Husserl’s Lebenswelt) remains a variously inflected constant in his thought, Althusser’s reading of Capital offers an objective correction or supplement to Patočka’s diagnosis. In this view, it is Reading Capital that first presents Marx’s Capital as a scientifically precise yet historically and socially determined and “concerned” (to use Patočka’s term) logical formalization of the contemporary, capitalist world. While Patočka’s few passing references to the young Marx throughout his kompletní dílo uniformly present the latter as a thinker of the post-Hegelian humanism of labour and productive subjectivity, I argue following Althusser and Alain Badiou that in Capital, Marx constructs an asubjective science of the necessary forms of appearance of all things in a historically specific world, a logical and scientific formalization of the historically specific “life world” Marx defines as the capitalist social form.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GA19-20319S" target="_blank" >GA19-20319S: From Bolzano to Badiou: An Investigation of the Foundations of Historical Epistemology and Modern European Philosophy</a><br>
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Studies in East European Thought
ISSN
0925-9392
e-ISSN
1573-0948
Volume of the periodical
77
Issue of the periodical within the volume
3
Country of publishing house
DE - GERMANY
Number of pages
24
Pages from-to
511-534
UT code for WoS article
001339313500002
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85207017492