All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

At the Crossroads. Patočka and Althusser on the Idea of Modern Science

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F25%3A00601889" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/25:00601889 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-024-09680-z" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-024-09680-z</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11212-024-09680-z" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11212-024-09680-z</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    At the Crossroads. Patočka and Althusser on the Idea of Modern Science

  • Original language description

    In this article, I examine the points of confluence and dissonance in Jan Patočka and Louis Althusser’s respective theories of the idea of modern science, focusing on two texts from 1965, Patočka’s “Conférences de Louvain” and Althusser’s Lire le Capital. I argue that while Patočka’s diagnosis—which he shares with Husserl-of the “abyss” lying between the empty schematism of modern scientific formalization and an engaged concern for the přirození svět or “natural world” (broadly analogous to Husserl’s Lebenswelt) remains a variously inflected constant in his thought, Althusser’s reading of Capital offers an objective correction or supplement to Patočka’s diagnosis. In this view, it is Reading Capital that first presents Marx’s Capital as a scientifically precise yet historically and socially determined and “concerned” (to use Patočka’s term) logical formalization of the contemporary, capitalist world. While Patočka’s few passing references to the young Marx throughout his kompletní dílo uniformly present the latter as a thinker of the post-Hegelian humanism of labour and productive subjectivity, I argue following Althusser and Alain Badiou that in Capital, Marx constructs an asubjective science of the necessary forms of appearance of all things in a historically specific world, a logical and scientific formalization of the historically specific “life world” Marx defines as the capitalist social form.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA19-20319S" target="_blank" >GA19-20319S: From Bolzano to Badiou: An Investigation of the Foundations of Historical Epistemology and Modern European Philosophy</a><br>

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Studies in East European Thought

  • ISSN

    0925-9392

  • e-ISSN

    1573-0948

  • Volume of the periodical

    77

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    3

  • Country of publishing house

    DE - GERMANY

  • Number of pages

    24

  • Pages from-to

    511-534

  • UT code for WoS article

    001339313500002

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85207017492