Misreporting of government transfers: how important are survey design and geography?
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985998%3A_____%2F18%3A00461843" target="_blank" >RIV/67985998:_____/18:00461843 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Misreporting of government transfers: how important are survey design and geography?
Original language description
Recent studies linking household surveys to administrative records reveal high rates ofnmisreporting of program receipt. We use the FoodAPS survey to examine whether thenfindings of these studies of general household surveys using one or two states generalize tona survey with a narrow focus and across many states. First, we study how reporting errorsndiffer from other surveys. We find a lower rate of false negatives (failures to report truenreceipt) in FoodAPS, likely partly due to the shorter recall period of FoodAPS. Misreportingnvaries with household characteristics and between interviewers. Second, we examinengeographic heterogeneity in survey error to assess whether we can extrapolate from linkedndata from a few states. We find systematic differences between states in unconditionalnerror rates but no evidence of substantial differences conditional on common covariates.nThus, extrapolating error rates across states may yield more accurate receipt estimates thannuncorrected survey estimates.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
O - Miscellaneous
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50202 - Applied Economics, Econometrics
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2018
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů