Gender gaps in student academic achievement and inequality
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985998%3A_____%2F18%3A00498370" target="_blank" >RIV/67985998:_____/18:00498370 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1479-353920180000020008" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1479-353920180000020008</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1479-353920180000020008" target="_blank" >10.1108/S1479-353920180000020008</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Gender gaps in student academic achievement and inequality
Original language description
Results from international large-scale assessments, such as PISA surveys, suggest that boys do better in math and science, whereas girls do better in reading. How do gender gaps vary across subjects, when estimated simultaneously? Building on the work of Tsai, Smith, and Hauser (2017), we answer this question by applying a multilevel-MIMIC model that enables us to estimate gender gaps in two ways: gender differences in the effects of observed family and school factors on math, science, and reading scores, and the “adjusted” gender gaps in test scores across all three subjects after controlling for observables. We apply the model to 2012 PISA data of students aged 15–16 and enrolled in 9th or 10th grade in three East Asian (Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan) and three Western countries (USA, Germany, and the Czech Republic) that represent both similar and different types of school systems. Our findings indicate that the gender gap in math or science achievement in Western countries, favoring boys, does not necessarily apply to the East Asian countries examined here, while all three East Asian countries exhibit similar features of gender reading gaps in the 10th grade. There is evidence indicating that observed background and school factors impact boys’ and girls’ achievement in a similar way in USA, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and the Czech Republic, but not in Germany. Overall, gender differences in family and school influences do not account for gender differences in academic achievement in any of the six countries.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
C - Chapter in a specialist book
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50202 - Applied Economics, Econometrics
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2018
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Book/collection name
Research in the sociology of education
ISBN
978-1-78769-078-3
Number of pages of the result
38
Pages from-to
181-218
Number of pages of the book
226
Publisher name
Emerald Publishing
Place of publication
Bingley
UT code for WoS chapter
—