Validity of Cognitive ability tests ? comparison of computerized adaptive testing with paper and pencil and computer-based forms of administrations
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68081740%3A_____%2F12%3A00380979" target="_blank" >RIV/68081740:_____/12:00380979 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Validity of Cognitive ability tests ? comparison of computerized adaptive testing with paper and pencil and computer-based forms of administrations
Original language description
The study analyzes and compares the validity of computerized adaptive testing, paper and pencil and computer-based forms of cognitive abilities tests. The research was conducted on a sample of 803 secondary school students (567 paper and pencil, 236 computer-based/computerized adaptive administration; 363 males, 440 females), their mean age was 16.8 years (SD = 1.33). The test set consisted of the Test of Intellect Potential and the Vienna Matrices Test. Overall results showed that the validity of CAT was reasonably comparable across administration modes. Consistent with previous research, CAT selecting only a small number of items gave results which, in terms of validity, were only marginally different from the results of traditional administration. CAT simulated administration of the TIP was roughly 55% and VMT 54 % more economical than the traditional version. These results indicate that CAT is a useful way of improving methodology of psychological testing.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
AN - Psychology
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GP406%2F09%2FP284" target="_blank" >GP406/09/P284: The issues of polytomous IRT models in the field of psychology of personality and its implementation in the CATO software framework</a><br>
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2012
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Studia Psychologica
ISSN
0039-3320
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
54
Issue of the periodical within the volume
3
Country of publishing house
SK - SLOVAKIA
Number of pages
14
Pages from-to
181-194
UT code for WoS article
000310489100002
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—