The Self Between Cacophony and Monologue: A Conceptualization and Empirical Examination of Dialogical Complexity
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68081740%3A_____%2F17%3A00474290" target="_blank" >RIV/68081740:_____/17:00474290 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2016.1219892" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2016.1219892</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2016.1219892" target="_blank" >10.1080/10720537.2016.1219892</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
The Self Between Cacophony and Monologue: A Conceptualization and Empirical Examination of Dialogical Complexity
Original language description
Theory of dialogical self distinguishes between cacophonous, monological, and dialogical structure of the self. So far these structures have not been examined within systematic quantitative studies. Focusing on this issue, we conceptualized the three structures as degrees on a dimension of dialogical complexity. To assess dialogical complexity, we proposed a numerical index derived from the personal position repertoire and examined it empirically. We compared the index of dialogical complexity with indices of cognitive complexity (derived from the repertory grid technique), integrative complexity, and presence of dialogical relationships in narratives (both derived from the thematic apperception test). In our sample of a total of 60 nonclinical respondents, the index of dialogical complexity was not correlated with cognitive complexity. It was weakly negatively but significantly correlated with integrative complexity. Respondents who yielded a higher score of dialogical relationships in narratives formed the dialogical structure of the self according to the dialogical complexity index. Respondents who yielded less dialogical relationships in narratives obtained a wider range of dialogical complexity scores that indicated more cacophonous or monological structures. We conclude that the relationships with integrative complexity and with presence of dialogical relationships in narratives support the original conceptualization of dialogical complexity. However, due to limitations of the study, the results are not decisive, and further examination of dialogical complexity including clinical samples is needed.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50101 - Psychology (including human - machine relations)
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2017
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Journal of Constructivist Psychology
ISSN
1072-0537
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
30
Issue of the periodical within the volume
3
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
25
Pages from-to
270-294
UT code for WoS article
000400245600004
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-84986200991