All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

The development of infants’ sensitivity to native versus non-native rhythm

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68081740%3A_____%2F21%3A00549662" target="_blank" >RIV/68081740:_____/21:00549662 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/61989592:15210/21:73606633 RIV/00216208:11210/21:10440839

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/infa.12395" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/infa.12395</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/infa.12395" target="_blank" >10.1111/infa.12395</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    The development of infants’ sensitivity to native versus non-native rhythm

  • Original language description

    Speech rhythm is considered one of the first windows into the native language, and the taxonomy of rhythm classes is commonly used to explain early language discrimination. Relying on formal rhythm classification is problematic for two reasons. First, it is not known to which extent infants' sensitivity to language variation is attributable to rhythm alone, and second, it is not known how infants discriminate languages not classified in any of the putative rhythm classes. Employing a central-fixation preference paradigm with natural stimuli, this study tested whether infants differentially attend to native versus nonnative varieties that differ only in temporal rhythm cues, and both of which are rhythmically unclassified. An analysis of total looking time did not detect any rhythm preferences at any age. First-look duration, arguably more closely reflecting infants' underlying perceptual sensitivities, indicated age-specific preferences for native versus non-native rhythm: 4-month-olds seemed to prefer the native-, and 6-month-olds the non-native language-variety. These findings suggest that infants indeed acquire native rhythm cues rather early, by the 4th month, supporting the theory that rhythm can bootstrap further language development. Our data on infants' processing of rhythmically unclassified languages suggest that formal rhythm classification does not determine infants' ability to discriminate language varieties.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50101 - Psychology (including human - machine relations)

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA18-01799S" target="_blank" >GA18-01799S: The effect of talker accent on speech sound learning in infants</a><br>

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Infancy

  • ISSN

    1525-0008

  • e-ISSN

    1532-7078

  • Volume of the periodical

    26

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    3

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    19

  • Pages from-to

    423-441

  • UT code for WoS article

    000622343100001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85101814650