Towards the spatial coherence of biogeographical regionalizations at subcontinental and landscape scales
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68145535%3A_____%2F16%3A00466475" target="_blank" >RIV/68145535:_____/16:00466475 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216224:14310/16:00088217 RIV/00216208:11620/16:10330933
Result on the web
<a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbi.12832/full" target="_blank" >http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbi.12832/full</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12832" target="_blank" >10.1111/jbi.12832</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Towards the spatial coherence of biogeographical regionalizations at subcontinental and landscape scales
Original language description
One of the fundamental tools in biogeography is the classification of the Earth surface into spatially coherent units based on assemblage distinctiveness. However, spatial coherence of biogeographical regions may be scale-dependent, that is, it may change with changing the size of spatial units used. We ask (1) how the clusters resulting from the classification of animal assemblages at different spatial scales differ in their spatial coherence, (2) whether there are geographical trends in the patterns of spatial coherence, and (3) what factors drive these patterns at different scales and in different areas of Europe. Location: Europe. Methods: We used data from distribution atlases at two spatial scales (50 50 km and c. 10 10 km) and, for each scale, we selected four different areas across Europe, each of them covered by 250 grid cells. We classified each area based on the distributions of mammals (coarser scale only) and birds (both scales). Subsequently, we calculated the spatial coherence of resulting clusters and correlated it with environmental factors and geographical distance. Results: Coarse-scale classifications provided more spatially coherent clusters than the classifications at the finer scale and this pattern was closely related to different strength of distance decay of similarity in the species composition at different scales. Spatial coherence revealed latitudinal trends, so that coarse-scale clusters were more spatially coherent in northern Europe. Geographical distance was the best predictor of spatial patterns at the coarser scale, although this effect was strong only in central and northern Europe. At the finer scale, topography and land cover composition were the most important. Main conclusions: Spatial coherence of biogeographical regionalizations depends on scale and varies geographically.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
DE - Earth magnetism, geodesy, geography
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GAP505%2F12%2F1022" target="_blank" >GAP505/12/1022: Beta diversity of plant communities along constrained environmental gradients</a><br>
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Journal of Biogeography
ISSN
0305-0270
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
43
Issue of the periodical within the volume
43
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
13
Pages from-to
2489-2501
UT code for WoS article
000388870000016
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-84982873174