All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Assessment of models to predict surface subsidence in the Czech part of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin - Case study

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68145535%3A_____%2F20%3A00535483" target="_blank" >RIV/68145535:_____/20:00535483 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.irsm.cas.cz/materialy/acta_content/2020_doi/Jirankova_AGG_2020_0034.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.irsm.cas.cz/materialy/acta_content/2020_doi/Jirankova_AGG_2020_0034.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.13168/AGG.2020.0034" target="_blank" >10.13168/AGG.2020.0034</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Assessment of models to predict surface subsidence in the Czech part of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin - Case study

  • Original language description

    This case study presents the verification of two surface subsidence prediction models for longwallmining at depths greater than 400 m. The surface subsidence points were surveyed and comparedfor both models. The first model uses empirical calculations to predict the surface subsidence. This method is reliable for predicting surface subsidence at shallower depths. At present, however, coalmining has progressed to great depths. The second model is the 2-dimensional finite elementmethod to predict surface subsidence. In contrast to the first method, this method is based on the regional parameters and uses the rock mass properties to evaluate surface subsidence for multi-seams at any depth. Results show that the finite element method gives a better approximation ofthe measured surface subsidence than the Knothe method. The maximum surface subsidence,which was determined by the FEM method, was used to adjust the extraction coefficient in theKnothe's method. The predicted value differs from the measured value by 8 %. The slope ofthe predicted subsidence trough was within the range of 2‒8 % from the surveyed subsidence. This case study proposes a procedure for using both models to successfully predict the surface subsidence.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20703 - Mining and mineral processing

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Acta geodynamica et geomaterialia

  • ISSN

    1214-9705

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    17

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    4

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    16

  • Pages from-to

    469-484

  • UT code for WoS article

    000599963900006

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85097808128