Why people (do not) adopt the private precautionary and mitigation measures: A review of the issue from the perspective of recent flood risk research

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68145535%3A_____%2F21%3A00539085" target="_blank" >RIV/68145535:_____/21:00539085 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/2/140/htm" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/2/140/htm</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w13020140" target="_blank" >10.3390/w13020140</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Why people (do not) adopt the private precautionary and mitigation measures: A review of the issue from the perspective of recent flood risk research

Original language description

Based on the literature review, this paper synthesizes recent state of knowledge on flood risk perception and related human behaviors. The main attention is paid to private precautionary and mitigation measures, and the reasons why these are (not) adopted by agents such as individual households. Results of a wide range of relevant studies are presented and critically examined. The findings are presented within an interpretive framework established during the review process, six key themes (responsibility, risk perception, people and social environment, geography of risk, emotions, theories and conceptual models) and several sub-themes closely related to them were identified by the content/thematic analysis. These were then utilized to overview and discuss particular factors and issues involved, as well as various relevant theoretical underpinnings and conceptual models. The review identifies, illustrates, and addresses not only the consensual views and contradictory findings of flood risk research, but also several related and essential ambiguities, uncertainties, and knowledge gaps. Based on these findings, suggestions for future research are discussed, including the terminological, semantic, methodological, theoretical, and ethical aspects. The paper thus serves two main tasks: (a) It is a useful reference/departure point for those with research interests in topics and issues such as flood risk perception, flood risk protective and mitigation behaviors and measures, or flood risk management in general, and (b) it provides suggestions and incentives for future flood risk research agenda.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_imp - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

50704 - Environmental sciences (social aspects)

Project

<a href="/en/project/GA20-11782S" target="_blank" >GA20-11782S: The nature and dynamics of local land use conflicts in a polyrational arena</a><br>

Continuities

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Publication year

2021

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

Water

ISSN

2073-4441

e-ISSN

—

Volume of the periodical

13

Issue of the periodical within the volume

2

Country of publishing house

CH - SWITZERLAND

Number of pages

35

Pages from-to

140

UT code for WoS article

000611754100001

EID of the result in the Scopus database

2-s2.0-85099779299