All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Where Have All the Rural Poor Gone? Explaining the Rural–Urban Poverty Gap in European Countries

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378025%3A_____%2F19%3A00507755" target="_blank" >RIV/68378025:_____/19:00507755 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/soru.12235" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/soru.12235</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/soru.12235" target="_blank" >10.1111/soru.12235</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Where Have All the Rural Poor Gone? Explaining the Rural–Urban Poverty Gap in European Countries

  • Original language description

    This article contributes to explanations of rural poverty and deprivation by focusing on the rural–urban poverty and deprivation gap in European countries. Using European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions data, it confirms, convincingly, the limited validity of the argument for universally increased poverty and deprivation levels in rural areas in Europe, and demonstrates that the disparities are related to four theoretically elaborated factors: increased rural poverty can be observed in countries with lower rural population densities, in countries with a higher proportion of farmers, in post‐socialist transition countries, and in countries with generally lower economic development levels and decreased living standards. In particular, national economic development appears to be the essential factor behind rural disadvantage. Three interrelated negative processes have been revealed in the countryside of poor European countries: an increased concentration of low‐resource households, a higher poverty risk to these households, and additional poverty‐enhancing effects that operate independently of household resources. These direct rural effects are strongly conditioned by the national economic advancement and related urbanisation processes.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50401 - Sociology

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GC18-05704J" target="_blank" >GC18-05704J: Social disadvantage in rural peripheries in Czechia and in eastern Germany: opportunity structures and individual agency in a comparative perspective</a><br>

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2019

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Sociologia Ruralis

  • ISSN

    0038-0199

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    59

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    3

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    23

  • Pages from-to

    369-392

  • UT code for WoS article

    000478097700002

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85065673404