Where Have All the Rural Poor Gone? Explaining the Rural–Urban Poverty Gap in European Countries
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378025%3A_____%2F19%3A00507755" target="_blank" >RIV/68378025:_____/19:00507755 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/soru.12235" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/soru.12235</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/soru.12235" target="_blank" >10.1111/soru.12235</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Where Have All the Rural Poor Gone? Explaining the Rural–Urban Poverty Gap in European Countries
Original language description
This article contributes to explanations of rural poverty and deprivation by focusing on the rural–urban poverty and deprivation gap in European countries. Using European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions data, it confirms, convincingly, the limited validity of the argument for universally increased poverty and deprivation levels in rural areas in Europe, and demonstrates that the disparities are related to four theoretically elaborated factors: increased rural poverty can be observed in countries with lower rural population densities, in countries with a higher proportion of farmers, in post‐socialist transition countries, and in countries with generally lower economic development levels and decreased living standards. In particular, national economic development appears to be the essential factor behind rural disadvantage. Three interrelated negative processes have been revealed in the countryside of poor European countries: an increased concentration of low‐resource households, a higher poverty risk to these households, and additional poverty‐enhancing effects that operate independently of household resources. These direct rural effects are strongly conditioned by the national economic advancement and related urbanisation processes.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50401 - Sociology
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GC18-05704J" target="_blank" >GC18-05704J: Social disadvantage in rural peripheries in Czechia and in eastern Germany: opportunity structures and individual agency in a comparative perspective</a><br>
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2019
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Sociologia Ruralis
ISSN
0038-0199
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
59
Issue of the periodical within the volume
3
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
23
Pages from-to
369-392
UT code for WoS article
000478097700002
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85065673404