All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Populism in Power and Democracy: Democratic Decay and Resilience in the Czech Republic (2013-2020)

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378025%3A_____%2F20%3A00541380" target="_blank" >RIV/68378025:_____/20:00541380 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3420" target="_blank" >https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3420</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3420" target="_blank" >10.17645/pag.v8i4.3420</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Populism in Power and Democracy: Democratic Decay and Resilience in the Czech Republic (2013-2020)

  • Original language description

    Populism and technocracy reject vertical accountability and horizontal accountability. Populism and technocracy can combine to form 'technocratic populism.' The study assesses the extent to which democratic decay can be traced to the actions of technocratic populists as opposed to institutional factors, civil society, fragmentation and polarization. The main findings of this article are that technocratic populism has illiberal tendencies expressed best in its efforts at executive aggrandizement (cf. Bermeo, 2016). Without an effective bulwark against democratic erosion (cf. Bernhard, 2015), technocratic populism tends to undermine electoral competition (vertical accountability), judiciary independence, legislative oversight (horizontal accountability), and freedom of the press (diagonal accountability). The most effective checks on technocratic populist in power, this study finds, are the courts, free media, and civil society. This article highlights the mechanisms of democratic decay and democratic resilience beyond electoral politics. It indicates that a combination of institutional veto points and civil society agency is necessary to prevent democratic erosion (cf. Weyland, 2020). While active civil society can prevent democratic erosion, it cannot reverse it. Ultimately, the future of liberal democracy depends on the people's willingness to defend it in the streets AND at the ballot box.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50601 - Political science

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Politics and Governance

  • ISSN

    2183-2463

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    8

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    4

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    12

  • Pages from-to

    473-484

  • UT code for WoS article

    000605673200002

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85099381536