Populism in Power and Democracy: Democratic Decay and Resilience in the Czech Republic (2013-2020)
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378025%3A_____%2F20%3A00541380" target="_blank" >RIV/68378025:_____/20:00541380 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3420" target="_blank" >https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3420</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3420" target="_blank" >10.17645/pag.v8i4.3420</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Populism in Power and Democracy: Democratic Decay and Resilience in the Czech Republic (2013-2020)
Original language description
Populism and technocracy reject vertical accountability and horizontal accountability. Populism and technocracy can combine to form 'technocratic populism.' The study assesses the extent to which democratic decay can be traced to the actions of technocratic populists as opposed to institutional factors, civil society, fragmentation and polarization. The main findings of this article are that technocratic populism has illiberal tendencies expressed best in its efforts at executive aggrandizement (cf. Bermeo, 2016). Without an effective bulwark against democratic erosion (cf. Bernhard, 2015), technocratic populism tends to undermine electoral competition (vertical accountability), judiciary independence, legislative oversight (horizontal accountability), and freedom of the press (diagonal accountability). The most effective checks on technocratic populist in power, this study finds, are the courts, free media, and civil society. This article highlights the mechanisms of democratic decay and democratic resilience beyond electoral politics. It indicates that a combination of institutional veto points and civil society agency is necessary to prevent democratic erosion (cf. Weyland, 2020). While active civil society can prevent democratic erosion, it cannot reverse it. Ultimately, the future of liberal democracy depends on the people's willingness to defend it in the streets AND at the ballot box.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50601 - Political science
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2020
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Politics and Governance
ISSN
2183-2463
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
8
Issue of the periodical within the volume
4
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
12
Pages from-to
473-484
UT code for WoS article
000605673200002
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85099381536