Beowulf single-authorship claim is unsupported

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378068%3A_____%2F21%3A00548581" target="_blank" >RIV/68378068:_____/21:00548581 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-021-01222-5" target="_blank" >https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-021-01222-5</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01222-5" target="_blank" >10.1038/s41562-021-01222-5</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Beowulf single-authorship claim is unsupported
Original language description
Neidorf et al. 2019’s quantitative stylometric profile of Old English verse used several novel methods. Their study supports the unitary authorship of Beowulf and Cynewulfian authorship of Andreas, based on the ostensible homogeneity of a variety of features. The authors provided full access to their code and data, which demonstrates a praiseworthy commitment to open and replicable science. However, we argue that the methods presented are unsuitable for their purposes. Our replication study uses their unmodified data and text preprocessing steps, identifies errors in their analyses, questions the reliability of their results, and shows significant stylistic heterogeneity in Beowulf.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
60206 - Specific literatures

Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year
2021
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)