All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Totalitarianism as Defensive Memory of the Transformation. Unpacking a Czech Mnemonic Conflict

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378114%3A_____%2F24%3A00586988" target="_blank" >RIV/68378114:_____/24:00586988 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-42651-4_10" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-42651-4_10</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-42651-4_10" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-658-42651-4_10</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Totalitarianism as Defensive Memory of the Transformation. Unpacking a Czech Mnemonic Conflict

  • Original language description

    This chapter traces how the concept of totalitarianism has been used in Czech memory politics. Its first half briefly outlines the history of the term after 1989 until the present, while the second half focuses on a 2020 media controversy sparked by an interview with historian Michal Pullmann. Unlike Poland or Germany where nationalist, populist and far-right forces construct the memory of 1989 as an ‘unfinished’ revolution and betrayal, in the Czech Republic, populist forces are generally less interested in staging mnemonic conflicts about the past. The champions of the discourse of totalitarianism are rather both a liberal and conservative right, not necessarily united under the auspices of a particular movement or party. Adapting Bernhard and Kubik’s concept of memory politics to media actors, the chapter analyses printed media engaged in the Pullmann debate. It shows that the memory of the communist regime as totalitarian and thus demanding active denunciation was employed by predominantly conservative commentators to consolidate a defensive memory of the post-1989 democratic transformation, which they perceived as threatened by populist forces.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    C - Chapter in a specialist book

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Book/collection name

    Erinnerung des Umbruchs, Umbruch der Erinnerung. Die Nachwendezeit im deutschen und ostmitteleuropäischen Gedächtnis

  • ISBN

    978-3-658-42650-7

  • Number of pages of the result

    20

  • Pages from-to

    225-244

  • Number of pages of the book

    265

  • Publisher name

    Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH - Springer VS

  • Place of publication

    Wiesbaden

  • UT code for WoS chapter