All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Ionospheric high frequency wave propagation using different IRI hmF2 and foF2 models

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378289%3A_____%2F19%3A00517638" target="_blank" >RIV/68378289:_____/19:00517638 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364682619304109?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364682619304109?via%3Dihub</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2019.105141" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.jastp.2019.105141</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Ionospheric high frequency wave propagation using different IRI hmF2 and foF2 models

  • Original language description

    High frequency (HF) electromagnetic wave propagation is commonly used in long-distance communication and detection. The ionosphere is a highly variable medium affecting this propagation. However, mean climatological conditions are useful in order to determine a “base level” for the design and operation of systems using HF waves that propagate in the ionosphere. Important variables that determine these conditions are the ionosphere peak height, hmF2, and F2 critical frequency, foF2. In the present work the effect of different hmF2 and foF2 model options in IRI-2016 and its spatial variability are analyzed through the analysis of the ground range and reflection height of HF ray paths using a numerical ray tracing method. The model options are M(3000)F2, AMTB and SDMF2 for hmF2, and URSI and CCIR for foF2. We perform this study for a quiet day, April 26 at 12 LT, and solar activity maximum conditions. Ground range and reflection height variation between values obtained with the different model options are on average not greater than ~40%, but can be higher for a Pedersen ray case. These variations are in general much stronger than those obtained when Earth's magnetic field is neglected in ray path assessments. However, while the magnetic field effect is of “physical” origin that has always the same sign, the effect of changing a model used for certain parameter's estimation depends on the model performance which may vary with location and time.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10305 - Fluids and plasma physics (including surface physics)

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA18-01969S" target="_blank" >GA18-01969S: Atmospheric waves: dynamics and vertical coupling</a><br>

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2019

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics

  • ISSN

    1364-6826

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    196

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    Dec

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    12

  • Pages from-to

    105141

  • UT code for WoS article

    000501404800002

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85073049100