Intersubject agreement in evaluating the visual attractiveness of landscape

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F10%3A00173682" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21110/10:00173682 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/60460709:41330/10:49617
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Intersubject agreement in evaluating the visual attractiveness of landscape
Original language description
In this paper, we consider how to objectivise the effect of landscape aesthetic value. Unless a certain level of objectivization in this assessment is achieved, i.e. if there is no concord among evaluators, there can be no justification for using landscape aesthetic value as a criterion for decision making, and it will be impossible to defend decisions against claims of subjectivity. A hypothesis that assessors would agree in their evaluation of the visual attractiveness of 15 various landscape sceneries was tested, using as respondents a sample of 200 students of the Bachelor's and Master's study programmes in three university faculties with different specializations (architecture, forest management, environmental protection), by means of non-linear mixed-effects models.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
DO - Protection of landscape
OECD FORD branch
—

Publication year
2010
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)