Comparison of methods for georeferencing of multiple sheets map serie - Muller's map of Bohemia
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F16%3A00237681" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21110/16:00237681 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://juniorstav2016.fce.vutbr.cz/" target="_blank" >http://juniorstav2016.fce.vutbr.cz/</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
čeština
Original language name
Porovnání metod při georeferencování vícelistového mapového díla – Müllerovy mapy Čech
Original language description
The paper addresses a problematic aspect encountered during the georeferencing of old maps, namely georeferencing of multiple sheet map series. Currently, there are several methods available for the georeferencing of multiple sheet map series. Each method has its specificities and can be used in different cases. The paper describes and compares two methods. The simplest option is to merge the map sheets into one unit and successively georeference the entire map series. The second compared method is based on the adjustment with conditions. Each map sheet is georeferenced separately and conditions are added for the transformation to guarantee that the corners of adjoining map sheets fit. The comparison of the above examples was performed for Müller’s Map of Bohemia. In particular, the results of global transformation methods were compared – affine transformation and second-order polynomial transformation.
Czech name
Porovnání metod při georeferencování vícelistového mapového díla – Müllerovy mapy Čech
Czech description
The paper addresses a problematic aspect encountered during the georeferencing of old maps, namely georeferencing of multiple sheet map series. Currently, there are several methods available for the georeferencing of multiple sheet map series. Each method has its specificities and can be used in different cases. The paper describes and compares two methods. The simplest option is to merge the map sheets into one unit and successively georeference the entire map series. The second compared method is based on the adjustment with conditions. Each map sheet is georeferenced separately and conditions are added for the transformation to guarantee that the corners of adjoining map sheets fit. The comparison of the above examples was performed for Müller’s Map of Bohemia. In particular, the results of global transformation methods were compared – affine transformation and second-order polynomial transformation.
Classification
Type
D - Article in proceedings
CEP classification
DE - Earth magnetism, geodesy, geography
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Article name in the collection
Sborník konference JUNIORSTAV 2016
ISBN
978-80-214-5311-1
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Number of pages
10
Pages from-to
—
Publisher name
Vysoké učení technické v Brně, Fakulta stavební
Place of publication
Brno
Event location
Brno
Event date
Jan 28, 2016
Type of event by nationality
WRD - Celosvětová akce
UT code for WoS article
—