Multi-criteria decision making tool for technological variants of road rehabilitation
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F16%3A00301068" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21110/16:00301068 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Multi-criteria decision making tool for technological variants of road rehabilitation
Original language description
Following the current trend of increasing buildings density, both residential and industrial, the need to strengthen and improve transport and engineering infrastructure has become essential. Despite the fact that both construction and continuous road and transport network reconstruction are vital elements in meeting the sector`s criteria, numerous bodies, whether it is a state or a regional government, face various obstacles in its implementation. Having said that, it is the aim of this paper to present a valid concept of the multi-criteria decision-making software application called OptiVote. This tool is able to recommend its users the most suitable method and technological option for flexible road rehabilitation project. The first part of this article introduces several calculation tools that allow to independently evaluate different methods of reconstruction. Those are the OptiRec family software tools, solving the traditional way of reconstruction (mill and replace) and the cold and hot recycling. Further on, a description of the wide range of technological alternatives for flexible road rehabilitation follows. The main part of this paper is devoted to a case study presenting a project implementation with three different rehabilitation technologies. Particular parameters such as the emission demands of each technology are being evaluated here by the OptiRec calculation tool. Those are the input data for the newly developed multi-criteria decision making tool OptiVote. Based on the selected criteria, user receives a clear recommendation, what method and technology to choose for a specific reconstruction. It is also possible to combine several user-selected criteria. For instance, price together with the environmental impact in proportion to the given recommendation or the user's choice.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
D - Article in proceedings
CEP classification
JM - Structural engineering
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
C - Předmět řešení projektu podléhá obchodnímu tajemství (§ 504 Občanského zákoníku), ale název projektu, cíle projektu a u ukončeného nebo zastaveného projektu zhodnocení výsledku řešení projektu (údaje P03, P04, P15, P19, P29, PN8) dodané do CEP, jsou upraveny tak, aby byly zveřejnitelné.
Data specific for result type
Article name in the collection
Creative Construction Conference 2016
ISBN
978-615-5270-24-6
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Number of pages
6
Pages from-to
1-6
Publisher name
Diamond Congress Kft.
Place of publication
Budapest
Event location
Budapest
Event date
Jun 25, 2016
Type of event by nationality
WRD - Celosvětová akce
UT code for WoS article
—