Analysis of Tools for Revitalization and Rehabilitation of Brownfields

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F17%3A00334141" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21110/17:00334141 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

<a href="https://www.atiner.gr/papers/PLA2017-2318.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.atiner.gr/papers/PLA2017-2318.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Result language

čeština

Original language name

Analysis of Tools for Revitalization and Rehabilitation of Brownfields

Original language description

This work focuses on answering the difficult question of how we can work with brownfields and it deals with tools that enable the revitalization and rehabilitation projects in the area. The aim of this work is to identify, classify and analyze these instruments. It studies instruments from several countries with long-term experience with this issue (eg. France, Great Britain, Germany, Denmark, Czech Republic) and analyze their contribution and the feasibility of their implementation in other countries. The conclusion is that the tools can be divided into several categories from different perspectives: Strategic tools, Legislative tools, Spatial planning tools, Economic tools, Construction tools, Organizational tools, Information tools, Education tools, Contractual tools, Heritage tools and Rating tools. This leads to situation where the issue of brownfields is often handled by numerous institutions and instruments which could complicate the process. Some of the tools (especially the Economic and Legislative ones) are country-specific and cannot be that easily implemented, however some effective tools (for example Organization, Information and Education tools) don´t require any legislative background and can be therefore easily used by any country to help their brownfield revitalization and rehabilitation process.

Czech name

Analysis of Tools for Revitalization and Rehabilitation of Brownfields

Czech description

This work focuses on answering the difficult question of how we can work with brownfields and it deals with tools that enable the revitalization and rehabilitation projects in the area. The aim of this work is to identify, classify and analyze these instruments. It studies instruments from several countries with long-term experience with this issue (eg. France, Great Britain, Germany, Denmark, Czech Republic) and analyze their contribution and the feasibility of their implementation in other countries. The conclusion is that the tools can be divided into several categories from different perspectives: Strategic tools, Legislative tools, Spatial planning tools, Economic tools, Construction tools, Organizational tools, Information tools, Education tools, Contractual tools, Heritage tools and Rating tools. This leads to situation where the issue of brownfields is often handled by numerous institutions and instruments which could complicate the process. Some of the tools (especially the Economic and Legislative ones) are country-specific and cannot be that easily implemented, however some effective tools (for example Organization, Information and Education tools) don´t require any legislative background and can be therefore easily used by any country to help their brownfield revitalization and rehabilitation process.

Type

D - Article in proceedings

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

60500 - Other Humanities and the Arts

Project

—

Continuities

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Publication year

2017

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Article name in the collection

Athens: ATINER'S Conference Paper

ISBN

—

ISSN

2241-2891

e-ISSN

2241-2891

Number of pages

18

Pages from-to

3-20

Publisher name

Athens Institute for Education & Research

Place of publication

—

Event location

Atény

Event date

Jun 19, 2017

Type of event by nationality

WRD - Celosvětová akce

UT code for WoS article

—