All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Comparison of three types of laser optical disdrometers under natural rainfall conditions

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F20%3A00337475" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21110/20:00337475 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1709641" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1709641</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1709641" target="_blank" >10.1080/02626667.2019.1709641</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Comparison of three types of laser optical disdrometers under natural rainfall conditions

  • Original language description

    Optical disdrometers can be used to estimate rainfall erosivity; however, the relative accuracy of different disdrometers is unclear. This study compared three types of optical laser-based disdrometers to quantify differences in measured rainfall characteristics and to develop correction factors for kinetic energy (KE). Two identical PWS100 (Campbell Scientific), one Laser Precipitation Monitor (Thies Clima) and a first-generation Parsivel (OTT) were collocated with a weighing rain gauge (OTT Pluvio2) at a site in Austria. All disdrometers underestimated total rainfall compared to the rain gauge with relative biases from 2% to 29%. Differences in drop size distribution and velocity resulted in different KE estimates. By applying a linear regression to the KE–intensity relationship of each disdrometer, a correction factor for KE between the disdrometers was developed. This factor ranged from 1.15 to 1.36 and allowed comparison of KE between different disdrometer types despite differences in measured drop size and velocity.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10510 - Climatic research

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GF17-33751L" target="_blank" >GF17-33751L: Kinetic energy of rainfall as driving force of soil detachment and transport</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL – JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES

  • ISSN

    0262-6667

  • e-ISSN

    2150-3435

  • Volume of the periodical

    65

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    4

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    12

  • Pages from-to

    524-535

  • UT code for WoS article

    000508328900001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85078465818