Photogrammetry using UAV-mounted GNSS RTK: Georeferencing strategies without GCPs
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F21%3A00349828" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21110/21:00349828 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13071336" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13071336</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs13071336" target="_blank" >10.3390/rs13071336</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Photogrammetry using UAV-mounted GNSS RTK: Georeferencing strategies without GCPs
Original language description
Georeferencing using ground control points (GCPs) is the most common strategy in photogrammetry modeling using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-acquired imagery. With the increased availability of UAVs with onboard global navigation satellite system-real-time kinematic (GNSS RTK), georeferencing without GCPs is becoming a promising alternative. However, systematic elevation error remains a problem with this technique. We aimed to analyze the reasons for this systematic error and propose strategies for its elimination. Multiple flights differing in the flight altitude and image acquisition axis were performed at two real-world sites. A flight height of 100 m with a vertical (nadiral) image acquisition axis was considered primary, supplemented with flight altitudes of 75 m and 125 m with a vertical image acquisition axis and two flights at 100 m with oblique image acquisition axes (30° and 15°). Each of these flights was performed twice to produce a full double grid. Models were reconstructed from individual flights and their combinations. The elevation error from individual flights or even combinations yielded systematic elevation errors of up to several decimeters. This error was linearly dependent on the deviation of the focal length from the reference value. A combination of two flights at the same altitude (with nadiral and oblique image acquisition) was capable of reducing the systematic elevation error to less than 0.03 m. This study is the first to demonstrate the linear dependence between the systematic elevation error of the models based only on the onboard GNSS RTK data and the deviation in the determined internal orientation parameters (focal length). In addition, we have shown that a combination of two flights with different image acquisition axes can eliminate this systematic error even in real-world conditions and that georeferencing without GCPs is, therefore, a feasible alternative to the use of GCPs
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10500 - Earth and related environmental sciences
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2021
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Remote sensing
ISSN
2072-4292
e-ISSN
2072-4292
Volume of the periodical
13
Issue of the periodical within the volume
7
Country of publishing house
CH - SWITZERLAND
Number of pages
16
Pages from-to
—
UT code for WoS article
000638803500001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85104046359