Testing of soil aggregate stability by means of laser diffractometer Mastersizer 3000

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F22%3A00358185" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21110/22:00358185 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-4928" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-4928</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Testing of soil aggregate stability by means of laser diffractometer Mastersizer 3000

Original language description

Good stability of soil aggregates is an essential characteristic that positively affects soil health, increases agronomic productivity, decreases susceptibility to soil erosion and can improve carbon sequestration. The most common laboratory procedure for determining soil aggregate stability is a water resistance index (WRI) which is based on a wet sieving method. Within this contribution we introduce a newly developed method which utilizes laser diffraction for estimating the water resistance index of soil aggregates (WRILD). Recently, this newly introduced method has been tested and compared with the Kemper & Rosenau equation. This new method was developed with an emphasis on comparability to the standard sieving procedure performed with the Eijkelkamp wet sieving apparatus. The water stability of the aggregates was tested across five different soil types (haplioc Luvisol, Chernozem, Regosol, Fluvisol, Cambisol). The pH of each sample was measured and according to this value, either hexametaphosphate or sodium hydroxide was used to disrupt the stable aggregates along with ultrasound. The resulting WRILD is determined based on a fraction of undisturbed aggregates recorded for each fictitious sieve size. Initial results show promising agreement between the standard sieving and laser diffractometer methods. The advantage of the latter is a much faster processing time of a large number of samples and their replicates. This new method has a lower variability of results. However, further measurements are needed to validate the method. This study has been supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Technical University in Prague, grant No. SGS20/156/OHK1/3T/11 and EC H2020 Project 101000224 (TuDi).

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

O - Miscellaneous

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

10500 - Earth and related environmental sciences

Project

—

Continuities

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Publication year

2022

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů